SCOTUS allows Sandy Hook lawsuit against Remington

According to Fox News, the Supreme Court is allowing the wrongful death lawsuit against Remington Arms to proceed, despite protections under the interstate commerce clause.

“The decision will have immediate and severe consequences, exposing the firearms industry to costly and burdensome litigation,” Remington argued in its petition to the Supreme Court. “Thus, as a leading scholar on firearm-manufacturer liability has explained, the decision below will ‘unleash a flood of lawsuits across the country,'” it continued, citing Timothy D. Lytton, a professor at the Georgia State University College of Law.

So if you can’t win through stuffing the ballot box, as we saw in Virginia, the liberals can simply open the door to a flood of dubious lawsuits the same way they went after the tobacco industry in the late 90s to mid 2000s. I’m sure Ginsburg and Sotomayor will apply interstate commerce fairly, with John Roberts providing an eloquent decision, flopping harder than he has ever before.

Your rights do not spring forth from black robes. They don’t work for you.

What does work for you is arming up. Palmetto State Armory’s 2020 goal is to put so many guns in the hands of Americans that any effort to disarm will be nullified. Aero Precision is cranking out top notch ARs as well. You need more magazines, you need more ammo, but above all, you need training for what comes next. There’s never been a better time to get what you need than now- but that window might be closing. Without Rule Of Law? You’re living in it. This thing ain’t gonna fix itself.

 

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: admin

6 Comments

  1. Robin Allen November 13, 2019 at 11:03

    If their argument is that Remington manufactured something that caused someone else’s death and is therefore liable, Is it feasible to file a lawsuit against advocates of socialism on the basis that they are manufacturing an ideology that is responsible for countless deaths? This is not a troll question this is a sincere question. Is this feasible legally? Could it be done? Is it cost-effective?

  2. […] SCOTUS allows Sandy Hook lawsuit against Remington […]

  3. Bryce Sharper November 13, 2019 at 11:43

    The gun manufacturers, especially the big ones, also supply our military. Their business is only profitable with sales to civilians. We might as well quit having an army if we’re going to allow this. Maybe that’s the goal.

  4. Exring November 13, 2019 at 12:01

    Robin Allen, all you need to do is find an Attorney that is NOT a Democrat! It has been my observation that, if they are not a Democrat, they are a “shrinking violet”. There are other words that more vividly describe but I will try to keep a “non-civil” issue civil!

  5. mike November 13, 2019 at 16:58

    Such a decision opens up the whole economy to such stupidity. You can sue General Motors because they built to car that someone killed your wife with. Case law will apply and they will not be able to limit applicability to just the gun industry. The robed destroyers have really done it this time.

  6. Anonymous November 16, 2019 at 15:55

    4.5

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives